Pinnacle using same algorithm as BEST FTSO, tSovreign et al

ftso group test
#18

Are you implying a 0.02% spike is the same as what was posted above?
The magnitude matters as well.
For example in your picture with 01 u have a 10% difference from the median which if we compare it to what you used in your defense is a 500 times larger spike.
Its also about the amount. Two providers running for a year having a few spikes is different than 1 provider running for 1 month and already having tens.

1 Like
#19

This is slander and there is not enough evidence. As I have already discovered, the same phenomena appear with other providers as well.

#20

Hardly slander, @PinnacleFTSO with who have you seen the same phenomena occur? Are you referring to other colluding providers?

#21

I mentioned above already.

#22

Your reference above is irrelevant, the spikes above correspond directly with the reward band itself.

Based on your admission of guilt to be working with BestFTSO and your nonsense screenshot above, clearly meant to confuse others, @AureusOx supports the chilling of @PinnacleFTSO.

#23

Hi,

Are you able to answer this?

Edit: https://forum.flare.network/t/pinnacle-using-same-algorithm-as-best-ftso-tsovreign-et-al/358/15

AilandFlare running multiple providers
#24

You are digressing from the topic. There is no reason why I must tell you the reason unconditionally. I don’t think it is necessary to tell you specifically about internal disputes.

AilandFlare running multiple providers
#25

okay thanks, I respect your view in this instance

AilandFlare running multiple providers
#26

Slander? You admitted to working with best and your run pinnacle. That’s collusion no matter how you spin it.

1 Like
#27

Hi,

As no further evidence has been posted, would you want me put an onchain proposal ID through on the songbird network address

0x2004b4f504eeebef915546a6f279dde886b61c2b

Like this post if you would want me to proceed?

As a side note, I recommend not stating the direction you voted until after you have voted on the proposal ID should we choose to proceed.

This would be compliant with section ** 2.2 Process for Chill Proposals > 2. Chill proposal submission > Part A**

6 Likes
#28

Hi
Just wanted to add this to state that I am still monitoring this thread to see if I get enough interest to propose a chill proposal on songbird.

Once again, I recommend not disclosing if you would FOR or AGAINST - I am just looking to see if there would be enough interest to put through a proposal.

(compliant with section ** 2.2 Process for Chill Proposals > 2. Chill proposal submission > Part A**)

2 Likes
#29

Based on the evidence and accounts Bushi is in favor of a vote.

#30

based on evidence, we’d like to listen more opinions and we are available for a vote

1 Like
#31

Based on evidence FTSO London supports this proposal.

1 Like
#32

FTSOCAN is available for a vote.

1 Like
#33

In favour of voting for this proposal.

1 Like
#34

Hi
There has been more engagement on this

so Im thinking more signal providers are aware etc etc…so im thinking it could be a good idea to put a proposal in? I can provide a 48 hour notice before I set it up if we decided to proceed?

3 Likes
#35

Hi

I will be putting through a proposal on the 31st July 2023 on the songbird network.

3 Likes
#36

hi all, I will put proposal to chill pinnacle on tomorrow (31st July 2023) at about 12pm UTC

1 Like
#37

Hi All,

Please be aware proposal will be put live for voting in about 30 minutes.

Note that you have 48 hours to vote from then the proposal is on chain.

1 Like