yeah, I won’t repeat this. Anyway, I will run only one provider. Thanks @Moe_Sun-Dara . You gave me precious experience.
Good luck to your future.
Despite the ‘good intentions’ to run only one provider, its obvious that the proposal should go ahead since Pinnacle decided to spin up his second provider while the first one was chilled.
Since Pinnacle doesnt understand why this is wrong, I predict he will just spin up a new TSO after the second chill, or perhaps offer partnerships with someone and return to his old ways (oh wait, thats already happening on discord…).
Bushi supports this proposal
1 Like
I only run single ftso provider.
Keep in mind: STP.03 “Infractions are purposely undefined. The group will decide on a case-by-case basis whether an infraction has occurred, but this proposal aims to prevent behavior that impairs the FTSO ecosystem”
Ok, so for us it seems that AilandFlare and Pinnacle are owned by same person. When AilandFlare was chilled, Pinnacle was submitting during the chill period. Seems to be trying to skirt the rules by saying both weren’t running at same time, but what is obvious is both were being run by the same person. Have not heard any remorse, nothing about changing of algorithms or behavior.
Having two providers running similar algos and running one when the other is chilled seems to still impair the FTSO ecosystem. Maybe if they publicly came out and said they are shutting down AilandFlare and in two weeks after the chill will be running Pinnacle, it would not come off like they were trying to game the system.
Currently am for the chill, but will keep reading.
2 Likes
We support the proposal.
Don’t care about that. Create proposal. And I will find collusions between others.
Please do and report
How can you guys explain about this? LOL. I created a topic, but someone removed it. What is for. IF you want to protect the system, find their relationship.
Anyway, there are many spikes.
1 Like
1 Like
These spikes are insufficient, unfortunately. You’ll notice the blue shadow represents the volatility of the IQR reward band, it’s likely many other providers had spikes during the same epoch.
Spikes / erroneous submissions, or down time , where all other providers track normally is the best evidence.
1 Like