okay so is this real?
“Pinnacle and Ailand is mine…”
Yes, of course, so i can remove one of them on my mind. So after first chilling I removed ailandflare. Finally, I run one provider. You don’t have correct evidence to chill the pinnacle as second.
As you can see in that image, “But there is no provider now without Pinnacle”
So this part of theallegation
"On Feb 19th AilandFlare was chilled on Songbird for algorithm collusion with BestFTSO.
This suspension was to last 2 reward epochs (2 weeks).
On Feb 21st, Pinnacle suddenly began submitting on Songbird again after being dormant since it was chilled back in November of 2023 and just 2 days after AilandFlare was chilled."
As AilandFlare was chilled, you started up Pinnacle 2 days later?
Of course, after chilling of ailandflare, ailandflare couldn’t be run anymore, Because I selected pinnacleftso among them.
Yes, this is against the rules as far as I can see as you are circumventing the intention of chills.
Never, I think you don’t know the rules. After first chilling, if I run one provider, there is no reason of second chilling
I am relying on rules
I think I do. What would be the point of chilling a signal provider and their devs if they can just spin up another signal provider and continue?
To prevent the running of multiple providers. The topic of this forum is “AilandFlare running multiple providers”. But this is wrong. Ailandflare is not running. And only pinnacleftso is running now.
But you are running multiple providers as you have said, and you are responsible for Ailandflare and PinnacleFTSO
I think there is a problem in your sight. I didn’t say that I am running multiple providers. LOL, do you have correct eye? And I have private keys of ailandflare and pinnacleftso. But I didn’t run both. Furthermore, I removed ailandflare by sharing the private key and I am running pinnacleftso only.
Here “run” is past participle. In other words, I own pinnacle and ailand. Show me the screen shot of running them at the same time. And also that meant that I have run them before first chilling. But after first chilling, I am running only one provider.
Continue, I am funny to chat with you
as I have stated, its not relevant that both had to be operating at the same time, it seems that if one is chilled, then you would start up the other circumventing chill actiosn against you.
In any case, are you willing to provide the full conversation, reason I ask is to gain further insight:
yes I think its funny also
Ask to 4dads, maybe he has all. I blocked him because he was going to force me to tell I am running multiple provider. I said to him, I am running only one provider now and in the even future, I will run one provider only even I got hired into another team.
Of course, you can chill pinnacleftso and ailandflare. But I will gather vote power again, will start only one provider. then your efforts of now will be bubbles.
okay I take it you won’t be defending yourself then.
well I think this conversation is final.
I wish you luck for the future, and if you dont get the “right” outcome for you, perhaps use this as experience of not what to do. As you should have done with initial chills against you