AilandFlare running multiple providers

ftso group test
#82

start here

“This proposal will create a self-policing FTSO committee, called the FTSO Management Group, to report possible infractions by FTSO data providers and collectively determine whether punitive actions should be taken.”

and then read on

#83

So? Continue to talk.

#84

your more then welcome to continue to talk and refute claims. As you have not answered my question I dont see a productive way forward

#85

No problem. Good luck

#86

good luck, I will continue to monitor this chat and may ask further questions. But of course, its up to you if you answer them

#87

Of course, good work so far.

#88

The evidence here is clear, Aureus Ox supports this chill proposal

#89

@AureusOx Hey what evidence is clear?

#90

On Feb 19th AilandFlare (You) were chilled for two epochs. The chill was from Feb 19th to March 2nd. On Feb 21st Pinnacle (You) started submitting again. This is a violation of running multiple data providers and operating while being chilled. This is why the evidence is clear.

#91

AilandFlare was dead after as soon as got chilled

#92

Guys, I am poor. So there is no enough initial vote power to get whitelist. Pinnacle FTSO is also stopped from last week due to lack of vote power. Why do you want to remove my ftso? For now, I don’t run any one. don’t disturb me anymore. But if I meet an investor, maybe I can restart with my own algo with him. I developed my algo with my efforts and endeavors. Because I cut off the contract with BestFTSO, so I have unique algo now. So don’t disturb me anymore. Thanks everyone!

#93

The chill should still move forward. This is exactly what Best ftso did at one point to try to get people uninterested in chilling them as a provider. It did work initially, as the vote didn’t reach quorum, and they immediately started submitting again. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me.

1 Like
#94

This conversation is very confuse and no answers are given - so Aimlezz support this chill, because the evidence given is more likely to be the truth, than what anwers we can read from AilandFlare and PinnacleFtso.

1 Like
#95

We support this chill proposal

1 Like
#96

Guys, no problem. Maybe if anyone create a proposal for chilling, all will vote it. LOL. Because they don’t want high success rate data provider. Remember I had a unique algo and I had been running pinnacleftso only. Chill! I don’t care about it. @Brent-4Dads You said you were 26 years old? Okay, good childhood. Good luck, cowboy!!!

#97

Yeehaw. Good luck partner

#98

It comes as no surprise to see vote power previously delegated to @O1FTSO now delegated to Pinnacle.

1 Like
#99

If you chill pinnacleftso with insufficient evidence, that will be unfair. I think you need to look at the malicious behavior clearly.

#100

What you did by submitting under a different name, while your data provider was being chilled is the evidence. Unless you can prove that you didn’t do that and we are making a mistake then there’s probably no further need to talk.

1 Like
#101

You picked wrong evidence. Pinnacle and Ailand was chilled first. So after first chilling, which one will be selected is on my mind. Don’t focus on wrong thought!!!