Best FTSO tSoveriegn WorldsFTSO Same Dev or Algo

ftso group test
#30

We support chilling of these FTSOs.

1 Like
#31

bushi supports chilling both providers.

1 Like
#32

We also support this

1 Like
#33

I also support this proposal

1 Like
#34

tSoverign and Worlds have been suspected of doing this for a very long time, BestFTSO is more recent but given that they haven’t said anything in their defense means they either don’t care about their status or they’re too bold to acknowledge their faults.

I support the chill. Let the cold simmer through

3 Likes
#35

Please add your comments @BestFTSO, @tSovereign and @WorldsFTSO who will also need to request forum write access from @Tom_T

You’ve also been implicated by LoveFTSO on another thread Coffee FTSO is a clone of LoveFTSO - #24 by LoveFTSO

2 Likes
#36

It’s clear they aren’t even interested in give explanations. Not that this can be explained.

We support

1 Like
#37

It looks like the rapid rise of Pinnacle FTSO can be easily explained, sharing the same errors with Best FTSO and tSovereign.

https://songbird-ftso-monitor.flare.network/price?currency=XRP&startTime=3h&providerAddress=0x2004b4f504eeebef915546a6f279dde886b61c2b,0x66064b9755ff3c26c380be0fbe7f38df6222ba15,0x939789ed3d07a80da886a3e3017d665cbb5591dc

1 Like
#38

I think due to the lack of responses, im going to propose chilling these providers on the 5th July 2023

2 Likes
#39

Seems fair, they have been given plenty of time to respond and have been tagged in every channel possible.

#40

This. They’ve been confronted before and admitted it. Too bad they’ve not taken the effort to respond to this post.

#41

It wouldn’t have taken a strong response by the accused to sway my vote on this. I’m not inherently against shared infrastructure. But the shared pricing anomalies + absolutely no response is telling of foul play.

I support this one

2 Likes
#42

sure, just for the record, I have tried to contact best FTSO and worlds

https://twitter.com/sundaracouk1/status/1673378516660895769

tSoverign dont appear to have a twitter account…but I would think that if they share infra they would be able to contact each other.

2 Likes
#43

seperatly: a debate would have been good to further clarify rules and regulation they just needed to response etc etc

[Eidt: Songbird Proposal IDs 10, 11 and 12]

1 Like
#44

The evidence is also on Flare, a proposal to chill should also be submitted on that network.

https://flare-ftso-monitor.flare.network/price?currency=XRP&startTime=1d&providerAddress=0x510da05b7bf9d7713752da662aedb26770f30d19,0x693c74e3f72e8ba4b6382fd9ea1ed120b62d97d4

Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 1.51.48 pm
Screenshot 2023-07-06 at 1.51.48 pm2268×1300 302 KB

1 Like
#45

Would have been nice for Jimmy to speak up, as he provided a lot of assistance in early days and sharing node when other’s nodes were corrupt.

Sharing nodes was mentioned by Flare as okay early on, but the commonality of the submits looks too close to shared algos.

Voting to chill.

#46

Hi
checking the data on FLARE I will put is a chill proposal on Monday 10th July 2023

1 Like
#47

Hi

Flare proposals 8 and 9 are now live

#48

BestFTSO here to answer questions. We just became aware of these discussions.

#49

Hi

Here is a summary